Comandante C40 MK4 Nitro Blade edges out TIMEMORE Chestnut C3s, 8.5 to 8.2. It wins on performance, build & reliability, community love, while the Chestnut C3s is stronger on ease of use and value.
Side by side
Every detail, compared.
We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. It never affects our scores or what we recommend. How we make money
Comandante
C40 MK4 Nitro Blade
Highest score- • Pour-over enthusiasts who want a buy-it-for-life hand grinder
- • Travel and outdoor brewing with no power
- • Following online recipes written in Comandante clicks
- • A first quality hand grinder on a tight budget
- • Pour-over and AeroPress brewers who travel
- • Backup or office grinder
- Exceptionally consistent grind with low retention and clumping
- Nitro Blade burrs in corrosion-resistant high-nitrogen steel
- Made in Germany with spare parts and repair service
- All-metal aluminum body and 38 mm stainless S2C burrs for $89
- Clear, well-rounded filter cups for the price
- Compact and light enough for travel
- Slow: about 50 seconds for 20 g in The Coffee Chronicler's test
- No dial readout; you count clicks from zero each time
- Coarse steps (about 83 microns per click) make espresso hard to dial
- Internal dial is less convenient than an external adjuster
FAQ
Quick answers.
Which is better, C40 MK4 Nitro Blade or Chestnut C3s?
Comandante C40 MK4 Nitro Blade edges out TIMEMORE Chestnut C3s, 8.5 to 8.2. It wins on performance, build & reliability, community love, while the Chestnut C3s is stronger on ease of use and value.
Which costs less per unit?
Comandante C40 MK4 Nitro Blade works out to about $329 and TIMEMORE Chestnut C3s to about $89.00, based on typical retail prices when we last checked.
How do you score them?
Both are scored on the same five-factor rubric — weighted for flavor or performance, quality, value, sourcing or build, and community sentiment — using public specs, verified creator reviews and community consensus.